| 000 | 01672cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 681114s1968 nyua b 001 0 eng | ||
| 020 | _a0471512400 | ||
| 040 |
_aDLC _cDLC |
||
| 050 | 0 | 0 |
_aZ699 _b.L35 |
| 082 | 0 | 0 |
_a029 _bLAN |
| 100 | 1 | _aLancaster, F. Wilfrid | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aInformation retrieval systems : _bcharacteristics, testing, and evaluation / |
| 260 |
_aNew York : _bJohn Wiley & Sons, _cc1968. |
||
| 300 | _axiv, 222 p. :ill, | ||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index | ||
| 520 | _a As Lancaster clearly recognizes, "The quality of the index language is probably the most important single factor governing the performance of a retrieval system." Cited data on the MEDLARS system show that all but 2 of the system failures stem directly or indirectly from the inability of users to ask successfully for what they want in these extremely restricted and cantankerous "index languages." As a result, the actual performance of current systems range from mediocre to atrocious. An outstanding feature of the text is a careful and comprehensive evaluation of one of the best of the systems, MEDLARS. Overall, about 58% of the pertinent items in MEDLARS files are retrieved on request. Only about 50% of the items that are retrieved turn out to be pertinent to the request. This is not very good performance particularly when it is remembered that an "information retrieval system does not inform the user on the subject of his inquiry. It merely informs him on the existence ... of documents | ||
| 590 | _arpm 27/07/2018 | ||
| 591 | _aLoans | ||
| 650 | 0 | _aInformation storage and retrieval systems. | |
| 942 |
_2ddc _cBOOK |
||
| 949 | _a029 LAN | ||
| 999 |
_c9421 _d9421 |
||